Pandemic Flu More Condition_symptoms

Petition to save the public school

In recent days, the Council of the Institute of schools are meeting to discuss, among other things, the criteria for training classes. To make all the cuts envisaged by art. 64 of Law 133, the classes will be provided consisting of a very large number of students. In high school, the first classes must have a minimum number of 27 pupils and the remains are then distributed to 30, but in the workforce of the fact you can even get to 33.Sono numbers that degrade the quality of service and will go the classrooms and laboratories non-standard:

• both the indices of minimum educational function (MD December 18, 1975 - technical standards for school construction that sets the parameters minimum space available to each person in the place of school (1.80 square meters net for kindergarten, primary and secondary level, 1.96 square meters net for secondary school degree),
• for fire prevention (DM August 26, 1992 - fire prevention standards for construction school). This Decree paragraph 5.0 (Flocking) sets the maximum number of people in a classroom in the number of 26.).

also seem appropriate to evidenziare che la qualità dell'offerta formativa potrebbe risultare inevitabilmente compromessa dall'applicazione dell'articolo 64 e delle circolari ad esso correlate. Si reputano particolarmente allarmanti le problematiche indicate di seguito:

• dispersione scolastica (soprattutto nelle classi iniziali i margini di intervento da parte degli insegnanti nei confronti di studenti con difficoltà di approccio a determinate discipline risultano sottoposti a fortissime limitazioni)
• interventi individualizzati (fortemente limitata risulta anche la possibilità da parte del corpo docente di elaborare percorsi formativi finalizzati all'ottimizzazione del profitto scolastico e allo sviluppo delle potenzialità individuali)
• difficulty in organizing educational tours
• discontinuity teaching
• disintegration of the class in the case of incorporation of intermediate classes.

With this note, then you want:

• denounce the obvious contradictions between the directives of the Ministry (Article 64 of Law 133 of August 6, 2008) that require an increase in class size and the existing legislation on Safety and feasibility of local school (Ministerial Decree of 18 December 1975 Decree of 26 August 1992 the Ministry of 'Inside, Legislative Decree No. 81 of 9 April 2008: Consolidated Health and Safety at Work).
• draw attention to civil and criminal liability that could arise on School Leadership where those rules were applied to the detriment of the discipline constitutionally guaranteed safety and prevention in the school buildings. This legislation, based on the principles guaranteed by the Constitution, it overrides the laws enacted solely with a view to divert resources (size 8 billion and € 134 000 jobs over three years) from the school sector, to the detriment not only of the quality of training, but also for the safety of persons enjoying the facilities scolastiche.Il Headmaster and the Council of the Institute, therefore, have the responsibility and duty to verify case-by-classroom to classroom, whether it is possible to implement self-regulations concerning increasing the number of pupils per class. In the event of default, they themselves may be responsible for serious violations of safety rules and prevention.
• immediate call to action before it is definitively determine the organic next year and not resign or give up, (words that encompass the entire liturgy of the loser) to the new mass slaughter of jobs that we first opinions.

For the coordination of high school teachers of Modena "The Politeia"
Ioannis Lioumis (Member)